Interest rate cuts were a positive step, but experts say deeper policy adjustments are needed to maintain economic growth.
By staff reporter Li
Zengxin
By joining other central banks
around the world with coordinated interest rate cuts in October, the People’s
Bank of China anchored what many experts say is a rate-cutting trend designed to
protect the domestic economy from the current storm in the global
market.
But what China’s export-reliant
economy really needs in the face of slowing GDP growth and a possible recession
overseas, experts say, is a comprehensive fiscal package that includes tax cuts
and other measures to stimulate consumer spending.
Beijing’s central bank lowered the benchmark one-year deposit and lending
rates by 27 points, effective October 9, and the required reserve ratio for
commercial banks by five points, effective October 15. At the same time, the
Ministry of Finance abolished a 5 percent personal tax on interest
income.
The central bank’s September 15
move was its second “double cut” in less than a month. Unlike rate cuts made
that same day by central banks in the European Union, the United States
and other countries, the cuts made by the central bank were not aimed at
boosting equity markets. Rather, they were specifically designed to save the
Chinese economy from a slowdown.
China’s state-owned investment bank, China International Capital Corp.
(CICC), has predicted the central bank will continue to cut the lending rate
over the next 12 months. Its forecast is for reductions between 81 and 135 basis
points for the lending rate, and 27 to 81 basis points for the deposit
rate.
Meanwhile, the government’s
required reserve ratio for commercial banks should fall by 350 to 550 basis
points, CICC said, while the yuan’s appreciation against a basket of foreign
currencies should be from 2 to 3 percent.
Encouraging the latest
adjustments – and further cuts expected in the future – are justifiable fears
that the real economy is slowing, said Ha Jiming, CICC’s chief
economist.
Darker
Forecast
In general, China’s exposure
to the worldwide financial crisis has been limited. The U.S. Treasury said
China holds US$ 519 billion in
T-bonds. It also has between US$ 300 billion and 400 billion in bonds issued by
U.S. mortgage giants Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac, according to CICC. In addition, Chinese banks held US$ 670 million
in bonds with the bankrupt investment bank Lehman Brothers, while the
government’s sovereign wealth fund China Investment Corp. held a 9.9 percent
stake in Morgan Stanley.
Nevertheless, several global
investment banks and institutions have lowered their forecasts for China’s
GDP growth. Goldman Sachs adjusted its growth projection to 9.8 percent from a
previous 10.1 percent for this year, and to 8.7 percent from previous 9.5
percent for 2009. UBS cut its forecast to 8 percent from 8.8 percent for next
year. And Deutsche Bank China
economist Ma Jun expects China’s growth to slow to 8.4 percent
in 2009, and slide further to 7 percent in 2010.
The more pessimistic predictions
are based on threats facing Chinese business in the United States
and the European Union, which accounted for more than 40 percent of the nation’s
exports. With recessions looming in the United
States, EU and Japan, exports from China
may slow significantly.
China’s real estate sector has softened as well. The National Development
and Reform Commission reported that, for the first time, average home prices in
China’s largest 70 cities fell in
August compared with the same month 2007. The number of cities with falling real
estate prices increased to 25 in August, from just five in April.
“China was unscathed by the (global financial)
crisis, but it is not immune to the downturn,” Morgan Stanley’s
China economist Wang Qing told
Caijing.
Policy
Change
China’s challenges are
radically unlike those in the United States and the EU, where a
meltdown that started in the financial sector led to government “market rescue”
packages, said Shen Minggao, Caijing’s chief economist.
Of course the central bank’s
“double cut” decision sent a strong signal to build market confidence, said
Wang Tao,
China economist
at UBS. The bank may continue following this “asymmetric” style of rate cuts to
benefit the real economy and the market, she said.
But the central bank’s measures
are not a panacea for problems such as a credit shortage and long-term
profitability declines for companies.
No wonder China’s
stock market was lukewarm to the policy adjustments. On October 9, the day after
the rate cut announcements, share prices on the Shanghai and Shenzhen bourses rocketed at the
opening but soon curved downward. The Shanghai composite, Shenzhen and CSI 300
indexes finished the day lower.
Beyond rate cuts, experts say,
China needs a program based on policy
changes to improve the economy. Once the economy is safe, market improvements
will follow.
“Policy adjustment is crucial for
China,” said Zhu Jianfang, a
macroeconomic analyst at Citic Securities. Without a pro-growth policy package,
Zhu warned, China’s 2009 GDP growth rate may fall
to 7.5 percent – a so-called “hard landing.”
Options on the
Table
A fiscal policy package that
stimulates domestic spending, many analysts say, may start with reforming the
value-added tax system next year and later include lowering personal income tax
thresholds.
Wang said China should
relax quotas for loans to commercial banks. Some economists advocate government
debt to finance infrastructure construction, although most economists favor a
controlled program that does not mimic the large-scale, costly construction
campaigns of 1998. The focus of additional government spending should be to lift
household incomes and improve social conditions as well as healthcare systems,
said Huang Yiping, an Asia economist at
Citigroup.
To stimulate domestic
consumption, Shen said the government should launch a kind of “domestic demand
reform and consumption stimulation” scheme. “The key for this is to increase
household income,” he said.
A scheme could encourage middle
class consumption through tax cuts, stimulate rural consumption by relaxing
grain price controls, and provide government assistance to the urban
poor.
Regardless of the details, a
consensus among experts is that China urgently needs to shift from
export- to domestic-driven growth. Shen said a transition won’t be easy, but at
least there should be fewer concerns that inflation would worsen if tax cuts are
made to stimulate consumption.
Gao Shanwen, chief economist at
Essence Securities, thinks China’s inflation rate will fall
rapidly as prices of international commodities decline, relieving many companies
of profit pressure. And as export growth falls, exporters may shift to domestic
markets, boosting supplies and keeping prices in check.
1 yuan = 14 U.S.
cents