
Clarifying the Stimulus
Plan
At the core of
“Investment expansion is
one of the most direct and effective ways to stimulate economic growth,” said
Zhang Ping, chairman of the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC),
at an NPC press conference March 6.
The plan calls for the
central government to put 1.18 trillion yuan into the pot, with local
governments and private sources providing the rest.
How much that cash will
represent fresh spending? All of it, according to
Wen.
“This 1.18 trillion yuan is
completely newly added,” Wen said March 13 at a press conference in response to
public concerns over the investment. He said the spending will include
investments in new housing for low-income families, as well as money spending
for some roads and railway projects previously proposed as part of the
government’s most recent five-year plan.
Projects already on the
drawing board had to be included. “How could we otherwise affirm so many
infrastructure construction projects within such a short period of time?” Wen
asked.
But since the rest of the
funds -- 2.82 trillion yuan – are to be raised through local governments and the
private sector, a follow-up question is whether the central government’s input
can really trigger such huge outlays by stimulus
partners.
Under the plan, certain
investment projects will require set percentages of input from the central
government. For instance, the central government is to shoulder two-thirds of
the capital responsibility for school building, as well as provide subsidies of
300 yuan to 400 yuan per square meter for low-income housing construction in
central and western parts of the country.
Investments are to mainly
target seven sectors, with railways, roads, airports and waterworks accounting
for the bulk of the share and 1.5 trillion yuan. Post-earthquake reconstruction
mainly in
NDRC’s Zhang said the
original stimulus plan announced by the State Council include slight adjustments
to investment targets and a major reshaping of investment allocations. The
changes were made based on varying opinions from the public, he
said.
One area of heated debate
is over the 45 percent share of the spending devoted to infrastructure. Critics
say that’s too much. Some who object to infrastructure’s dominance point out
that a similar government investment plan after the 1998 Asian financial crisis
led to redundancies and overbuilding in cities.
“Intense investment results
in low returns and has little effect on mobilizing employment,” argued the
deputy director of the economic institute at the China Academy of Social
Sciences, who is also named Zhang Ping.
According to the academy’s
Zhang, urbanization is the key to boosting domestic consumption. And a viable
target for investment is low-income housing construction, as it not only
improves living standards but also speeds up urbanization. This investment focus
is not the largest in terms of spending but was
listed first on the government’s investment
agenda.