
Investor
Shudders
The Coke-Huiyuan deal was
the first rejected by authorities for failing to meet standards of the new
anti-monopoly law. And the decision came at a sensitive time for Chinese
investors seeking opportunities abroad. For example, some feared the decision
would compromise ongoing reviews of several proposed acquisitions by Chinese
companies in Australia.
Ironically, just as
Coca-Cola was rebuffed, Chinese government officials and scholars had been
criticizing some developed countries for using legal or administrative means to
restrict foreign investments and imports during the global recession.
And just a day before the
ministry’s decision was announced, a World Bank report ahead of a G-20 summit in
London pointed out that 17 of the world’s 20 major economies had imposed 47
restrictive measures on foreign trade, hurting the interests of other
countries.
Against that backdrop, the
failed Coke-Huiyuan deal was used by some foreign governments and investors as a
sign that protectionism had reared in head in China, too.
John Frisbie, chairman of
the U.S.-China Business Council, urged the commerce ministry to increase the
transparency of its antitrust reviews procedure, arguing that more openness was
needed to maintain confidence among global investors.
But China dismissed the
critics and noted that, since the anti-monopoly law’s enactment, 29
cases had been registered for review and 24 of them had passed
it.
Chen, the commerce
minister, said China’s policy in encouraging foreign investment had been
consistent. The proposed Huiyuan decision had nothing to do with discouraging
foreign investment in China, he said.
Shang Ming, general
director of the Anti-monopoly Department, said in an article March 24 that the
rejection was based on an interest in guaranteeing an open and competitive juice
market in China -- not to protect Chinese brands.
Comeback
Challenges
Huiyuan’s stock value
plunged nearly 50 percent after the merger was rejected. Market analysts said
they were pessimistic about chances for a rebound to previous highs. They also
predicted re-financing difficulties for the company, saying a good strategic
partner at a good price would be hard to find.
As a result, Zhu as well as
Danone are seeking ways out of their Huiyuan stakes. Sources close to Zhu told
Caijing the company chief is seeking new strategic investors for possible stock
transfers.
“We talked to Pepsi,
Uni-President (a Taiwan-based foods group) and other companies while negotiating
with Coca-Cola,” said a Huiyuan board member. “We’ll continue the
talks.”
Meanwhile, Huiyuan is
struggling. Teng Wenfei, a food and beverage analyst at the firm Shanghai
Security, warned in a recent report that the failed deal left Huiyuan short of
cash.
Zhu’s mobile phone was
turned off for days after the March 18
announcement.
The future is uncertain for
key management posts left empty when senior executives quit Huiyuan to make room
for Coca-Cola successors. Also unclear is the fate of plans for Minute Maid to
be produced on Huiyuan’s production lines, and for new products previously
scheduled for launch in the first half 2009.
“We lost direction,” said a
Huiyuan staff member.
In addition, Huiyuan has
withdrawn some of its investments in agricultural efforts and halted several
projects. Zhu had planned to switch focus to upstream businesses, investing 1.2
billion yuan in fruit and vegetable production in Hubei and Hebei provinces as
well as Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. These projects were signed in the name of
Huiyuan Group and mainly financed through pre-payments based on stock transfers
of its Hong Kong-listed company to Coca-Cola.
A source said Huiyuan has
run into a number of bottlenecks in areas such as marketing, sale channels and
management. Its small brands are fighting for market share, and its sale network
in northern China is weak.
A senior executive at
Huiyuan told Caijing that Zhu faces huge
challenges.
“On the one hand, he has to
form a new management and pump up morale,” the executive said. “On the other, he
should be prepared to confront fierce competition in downstream
markets.
“He has to work at it.”